Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(11)2022 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293698

ABSTRACT

Uterine carcinosarcomas are aggressive gynaecological cancers comprising less than 5% of uterine malignancies. We present the case of a woman in her 70s with a complicated history of advanced anal carcinoma treated with pelvic radiotherapy and multiple laparotomies, who was referred to gynae-oncology following MRI surveillance imaging showing evidence of endometrial carcinoma and para-aortic lymphadenopathy. Successful surgical excision required multidisciplinary teamwork between gynae-oncology, colorectal and urology surgeons. The patient underwent midline laparotomy, with adhesiolysis, ileum resection and side to side anastomosis, posterior exenteration, left kidney mobilisation and suspension, para-aortic lymph node debulking and left ureteric stent insertion. Significant challenge was posed by the extensive adhesions from previous laparotomies and the debulking of the para-aortic lymph nodes around the renal vessels. This case demonstrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in complex pelvic surgery and the vitality of good communication between colleagues in achieving effective patient care.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , Carcinoma , Carcinosarcoma , Endometrial Neoplasms , Lymphadenopathy , Female , Humans , Pelvis , Anus Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinosarcoma/surgery
2.
Anticancer Res ; 41(9): 4439-4442, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1395531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy are common treatments for rectal and anal cancer. Anticipation of treatment may cause distress and sleep disorders. This study aimed to identify risk factors for sleep disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 42 patients with rectal or anal cancer scheduled for radiotherapy, 16 characteristics were analyzed for associations with pre-radiotherapy sleep disorders including age, gender, performance score, comorbidity, patient's or family history of additional cancer/melanoma, distress score, emotional/physical/practical problems, tumor site and stage, surgery and relation to COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of pre-radiotherapy sleep disorders was 42.9%. Sleep disorders were significantly associated with Karnofsky performance score 60-80 (p=0.044), Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (p=0.0012), distress score 6-10 (p=0.00012), and more emotional (p=0.0012), physical (p=0.0004) or practical (p=0.033) problems. A trend was found for female gender (p=0.061). CONCLUSION: Sleep disorders were common in patients with rectal or anal cancer scheduled for radiotherapy. Risk factors can help identify patients requiring psychooncological support already prior to the start of radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Anus Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Aged , Anus Neoplasms/pathology , Anus Neoplasms/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prevalence , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/psychology , Sex Characteristics , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(9): 1002-1005, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-639403

ABSTRACT

AIM: This report summarizes the early experience of implementing elective colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A pathway to minimize the risk of including COVID-19-positive patients for elective surgery was established. Prioritization and additional safety measures were introduced into clinical practice. Minimal invasive surgery was used where appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were prioritized, and 23 patients underwent surgery (eight colon, 14 rectal and one anal cancer). The minimal invasive surgery rate was 78%. There were no major postoperative complications or patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Histopathological outcomes were similar to normal practice. CONCLUSION: A safe pathway to offer standard high-quality surgery to colorectal cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is feasible.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Surgery/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anus Neoplasms/pathology , Anus Neoplasms/surgery , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Colectomy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colostomy , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Ileostomy , Ileus/epidemiology , Laparoscopy , Length of Stay , London , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Proctectomy , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL